logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2013.08.08 2013고정887
업무방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In around 198, the Defendant asserted that D and E, the husband of the victim, have illegally acquired the said taxi without any justifiable reason, despite the fact that the Defendant transferred his personal taxi to D, who is the father of the victim C (n, 61 years of age) in a normal condition. From around 2009, the Defendant filed a civil petition with the police station and the competent administrative agency to the effect that D and E, the husband of the victim, from time to time, find the taxi at the office of “G” insurance agency located in Seongdong-gu Seoul, Seoul, which is operated by the victim, return the taxi and drive the taxi, and repeatedly file a civil petition with the police station and the competent administrative agency to the effect that the said “G” is engaged

1. At around 12:42 on July 13, 2012, the Defendant reported 112 to the Sungdong Police Station Hadong Police Station to the effect that the victim gets an illegal signboard and carried out funeral services, and then found it in the above “G office” office with the police officer, “the victim gets a victim,” and “the victim gets a fraud,” and “the victim pathnizes the article, and returned the vehicle.” These two years, the Defendant 30 minutes, including bushesheshesheshes the desire to read “the same year,” and the victim interfered with the business of the victim’s insurance agency by force by preventing the victim from sending phone calls to the insurance customer and performing various documents related to the contract.

2. On October 5, 2012, the Defendant reported 112 in the same manner as above 11:47, and found the above 'G' office again with the police officer. On October 5, 2012, the Defendant spreads a bath to the victim I (Nam, 41 years of age), who is an employee of the above office, such as “Fraud, e.g., fraud, e., e., g., e., g., e., g., e., g., e., g., e., g., e., e., e., e., 30

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness C and I;

1. Written Statement;

1. Each investigation report, judgment, and application of the statutes governing civil petition data;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act selecting a penalty;

1. The Criminal Act among concurrent crimes.

arrow