A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 2, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around 09:42, 09, received the clothes of the Defendant in front of Bapo-si B, and took a bath to his parents and took sound; (b) the Defendant, upon receiving a report from 112, recommended the Defendant to board the patrol box to separate the Defendant who was interested by Bapo-gu, the police box of the Bapo-gu Police Station C, a police box of the Bapo-gu, sent out, in order to remove the Defendant from his parents.

Therefore, the Defendant voluntarily posted the patrol car, but the Defendant started to walk the door of the patrol car with a view to drinking it, and the said D opened the patrol car to get the Defendant, and the Defendant assaulted the son of the above D on his own drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of public peace and order of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes on the Handling of 112 Declarations and 112 Declarations

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The degree of interference with the execution of public duties is relatively minor and considering the health conditions of defendants, etc.);