logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.06.04 2015고단1518
상해등
Text

[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 10, 2015, the Defendant was the victim B (the 60 years of age) who had drinking alcohol at a certain point within the “Fju” located in Young-gu, Busan, Young-do, and was punished for trial expenses.

The Defendant, by hand, killed the victim's face, body body, etc. due to drinking and drinking, was unable to identify the number of days of treatment. The Defendant inflicted bodily injury upon the victim.

2. Forgery of private signature, and the use of a false investigation or signature;

A. On February 10, 2015, the Defendant was arrested in the act of committing a crime at the Hamba located in the Young-gu Busan, Busan, on February 23:45, 2015, with the intent to conduct as if he was his relative I, and the name at the time of preparing a written confirmation of arrest of a flagrant offender is given “I”, resident registration number to “J”, and signed the written confirmation letter with “I” on the printed confirmation column, and affixed his own seal. As such, the Defendant sent the written confirmation stating the forged signature to K.

Accordingly, the defendant forged another person's signature and exercised it for the purpose of exercising it.

B. On February 11, 201, around 00:44, the Defendant was investigated at the Busan Youngdo Police Station Investigation Office and Criminal Team office located in Taedo-ro, Busan, Busan, Taedo-ro, 46, and 1 criminal facts, the name of the interrogation protocol was changed to "I", resident registration number was changed to "J", and as above, the Defendant signed the interrogation protocol as "I" on the printed statement of the interrogation protocol stating a forged private signature, affixed his own seal, and then sent the interrogation protocol to L by the police station of Youngdo-do who is aware of the forgery.

Accordingly, the defendant forged another person's signature and exercised it for the purpose of exercising it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect with regard to I and B;

1. Photographs of the victim;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes confirming the arrest of flagrant offenders;

1. Article 257(1) and Article 239(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

arrow