The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning of the appeal is that of the lower court’s punishment (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. In light of all the sentencing conditions, such as Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, motive for the crime, frequency of the crime, method of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., comprehensively taking account of the following factors: (a) considering the fact that the damaged police officer led to confession and reflects by the Defendant; (b) the fact that the Defendant was punished by a fine for another crime during the period of repeated crime; (c) the Defendant did not know despite being punished by a fine; (d) the State’s legal order and order and establishment of public authority; (d) there is a need to strictly punish the crime of this case; (e) the Defendant’s obstruction of the performance of official duties; (e) the Defendant committed serious injury to the victimized police officer with four (4) caution in the course of obstructing the performance of official duties; and (e) the Defendant committed serious injury to the victimized police officer in the course of obstructing the performance of official duties, the

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.