The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning of the appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (7 million won in penalty) is too unfluent and unreasonable.

2. In full view of all the sentencing conditions, such as the defendant's age, sexual conduct, motive for the crime, frequency of the crime, method of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., the court below's punishment cannot be deemed unfair because it is too unfeasible, in light of the following circumstances: (a) the confession of the crime; (b) the confession of the crime; and (c) the degree of interference with the performance of official duties by the defendant's use of force; (d) the fact that the defendant's use of force; (e) the defendant's use of force; and (e) the fact that the defendant's use of force and the degree of interference with the performance of official duties seems to have been committed for a period of suspension of execution of the same kind of crime; (e) the police officer's dispatch without any particular reason; and (e) the need for strict punishment of the crime obstructing the performance of official duties;

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.