logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2012.11.15 2012고단873
사기등
Text

Defendant

C and D shall be punished by imprisonment for one year and six months, by imprisonment for Defendant A, by imprisonment for one year, by eight months, and by Defendant B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2012 Highest 873"

1. Fraud;

A. On October 12, 2010, Defendant A leased 1 water purifiers(BA11-A et al.) to Defendant A in the Dongsan-si Office of Hsan-si Hsan-si, Ansan-si, and (BA11-A et al.) in the name of the victim I.

However, at the time, the defendant did not have any property, while he did not have the intention or ability to pay the rent properly due to the excessive debt.

Nevertheless, the Defendant applied for the lease of water purifiers in the name of the victim, thereby causing property damage to the victim I and acquiring pecuniary profits equivalent to the amount of the lease, by the method of not paying KRW 1,953,180 for the lease of water purifiers from October 15, 201 to November 16, 201.

B. On December 28, 2010, Defendant A made a false statement to the said victim that “The said victim would be paid monthly installments to purchase a heavy vehicle in the name of the third party in the name of the said third party.”

However, at the time, the defendant was above.

For the same reason, there was no intention or ability to pay installments properly.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, applied for installment financing under the condition of “the amount of loan 27 million won and the equal repayment of principal and interest for 36 months” in the name of the victim, and purchased JM7 car, thereby causing property damage to the victim by means of failing to pay installments, and acquired pecuniary benefits equivalent to the said amount.

C. On April 7, 2011, Defendant A made a false statement to the victim that “A would make an application for installment financing payment to be made well in the name of the third village in which the MF7 vehicle previously purchased was scrapped due to the accident and the new vehicle was purchased.”

However, at the time, the defendant was above.

For the same reason, there was no intention or ability to pay installments properly.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim and is named the victim.

arrow