Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and for six months, respectively.

However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On January 19, 2017, Defendant A was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Daejeon District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 13, 2017.

【Criminal Facts】

Defendant

A is a person who has been engaged in the past credit business, and Defendant B is a person who has been engaged in finite.

Defendant

A on June 2015, at the office operated by Defendant A, who is located in Daejeon Seosung-gu, Daejeon, Daejeon, he could not receive a loan due to low credit rating from Defendant B, who was introduced by the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the local government of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the local government. The branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the vehicle.

Accordingly, Defendant B would pay KRW 749,176, and KRW 740,271 each time over 60 times to an employee who could know the name of the victim E company as he notified by Defendant A, while making a false statement to the effect that Defendant B would make an installment for the loan of the fund for purchasing passenger cars with a second class of Fluent loan, which is a second class of 28 million won.

‘A written agreement on installment financing and erroneous discussion’ was prepared to the effect that it was submitted along with the relevant documents, etc., and that it was remitted from the victim company to the account in the name of G, which is the intermediary company for installment financing on the same day.

However, in fact, even if the Defendants received installment financing loans as above, the Defendants were to make installment payments.