A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 26, 2014, at around 19:00 on March 26, 2014, the Defendant asserted with the victim D (the age of 79) and the parking problems that had been previously pending, and sought to improve the use of farming, which is a dangerous object in a warehouse, at one’s own house located in a warehouse of about 100 meters away from that place, and sought again as C office to improve the victim’s understanding toward the future, and said, she said that she was frighted with the victim’s death.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of police suspect regarding D;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to records of seizure, list of seizure and photographs of seized articles;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime concerned, and Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (i.e., the fact that the mistake of a person is recognized and against his/her will, the fact that the victim agreed smoothly with the victim, and the fact that there are some circumstances that can be considered in light of the circumstance that the victim committed the instant crime, first of all, while engaging in a dispute with the victim, he/she committed the instant crime);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Discretionary Reasons for Discretionary Mitigation);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act of confiscation;