logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2014.08.08 2014고정256
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동재물손괴등)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Joint offenses with C;

A. On February 1, 2014, the Defendant, in violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint destruction and damage, etc. of property), attempted to purchase an drunk tobacco in the “victim E and F operation” located in Gangnam-si, Gangnam-si, but the victims were forced to put a warning that no tobacco exists.

Accordingly, the defendant and C have been placed on the floor of the victims' 39,800 won which was displayed in the Mat of the victims.

Accordingly, the defendant and C jointly damaged the property owned by the victims.

B. The Defendant and C interfered with the work of the victims by force by avoiding the disturbance between 30 minutes at the above time and at the above place.

2. The defendant's sole criminal conduct;

A. The Defendant is injured by the above 1-A.

At the time and place specified in paragraph (1), the victim H (n, 46 years of age) who is an employee of the above Mart had the face of the victim H at one time in order to report to the police, and had the victim H receive approximately 1 week treatment, such as an injury on the face of the part of the victim E (n, 69 years of age) at one time in order to take the face of the victim E (n, e.g., the victim E) who took the face of the victim E (n, e., e., e., about 2 weeks of treatment.

Accordingly, the defendant injured the victims of each injury.

B. On February 2, 2014, at around 07:00, the Defendant, who interfered with business, was able to escape a disturbance between 30 minutes, such as a frighter, and frighter, who was arrested as an offender in the act of causing injury to H and E, while drunkly drinking, and fright to the frighter, who was the owner of the fright, and frighter, and fright to walk the frighter, who was the owner of the frighter, and fright the frighter to walk the frighter while talking around customers.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's marina business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding C;

1. Each statement of H and E;

1.F.

arrow