logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2019.06.14 2018고합408
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(강제추행)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. In August 2016, the Defendant suffered special injury, on the grounds that the victim D (manam and 15 years old at the time) is prone to prone and prone, and the victim D is prone to be prone and prone, and the victim was prone to be prone in a short answer, and thereafter, the Defendant added the victim’s vessel to the victim’s length by force and by virtue of the change in the indictment of the prosecution, which is a dangerous object, ex officio in accordance with the contents of the amendment in the indictment of the prosecution.

The victim's arms were put on the victim's arms due to a cigaretteing, and the part of the medical treatment days was put on the victim's arms.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.

2. Around 07:00 on November 25, 2017, the Defendant violated the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (Indecent Act by compulsion) refers to: (a) the victim’s her son at the home of the said victim (at that time he/she was 16 years of age); (b) the victim’s her son is her son; (c) the victim’s son is her son; (d) the victim’s son is her son; (e) the victim’s son is her son; and (e) the victim’s son is her son; and (e) the victim’s son is her son and her son; and (e) the victim’s son’s son was fright, who was assaulted by the Defendant from the Pyeongtaek-gu, Gwangju-gu; and (e) the victim’s son was off from his/her son’s son; and (e) the victim’s son’s son and her son’s her son.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. The defendant asserts to the effect that the victim DNA body photograph does not constitute a dangerous article against the crime of special injury as indicated in the judgment.

"Dangerous articles" as referred to in Article 258-2 of the Criminal Act means deadly weapons.

arrow