logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.06.12 2013가합38980
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Defendant B shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 236,36,00,00 per annum from June 18, 2013 to the day of full payment.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Defendant B’s fraud and other criminal acts 1) Defendant B had forged resident registration certificates and driver’s license in the manner of removing the photograph attached to the Defendant B’s resident registration certificates and driver’s license and inserting the photograph attached to the Defendant B’s license, and Defendant B used the forged resident registration certificates and driver’s license, and the real estate listed in the attached Table 1 that Defendant B owned by C (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

(2) On October 11, 201, Defendant B provided as security and acquired money under the name of borrowed money. Defendant B provided as security and obtained money from the E Office located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “Defendant Gangseo-gu”) to F who is a public official belonging to Defendant Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “Defendant Gangseo-gu”) as stated in the above paragraph (1).

In the criminal case of Defendant B’s above fraud (U.S. District Court Decision 2012 Ma420, 890, 1068), Defendant B presented a driver’s license to the prosecutor’s office, and Defendant B did not specifically raise any objection to the Plaintiff’s questioning that the driver’s license was presented during the party’s questioning process of Defendant B, but on the other hand, Defendant B was issued a certificate of personal seal impression with Defendant B’s resident registration certificate presented in the above criminal case case and the civil case between C and E and En. (Seoul Central District Court Decision 2012Ga12065). It is unclear whether the identification card presented to the public official in charge is a resident registration certificate upon receipt of Defendant B’s certificate of personal seal impression issued in the name of Defendant B. In addition, Defendant B issued a certificate of personal seal impression under the name of the public official in charge of Defendant B with knowledge that it is a resident registration certificate or not. Defendant B issued the certificate of personal seal impression under the name of the public official in charge of the above Defendant B’s office.

arrow