logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 속초지원 2013.06.05 2012고단351
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant operated “D” entertainment taverns under the Ctel at the beginning of Silsi-si.

1. Around April 14, 2012, the Defendant: (a) received 250,000 won as the price for sexual traffic from E innbs near the main point of “D” and arranged sexual traffic by having F, an employee of the said main point, receive 250,000 won as the price for sexual traffic; and (b) had F, an employee of the said main place of entertainment, who was found to be a customer in the said main place of entertainment; and (c) had military personnel incom

2. On July 2012, the Defendant: (a) had F, an employee of the said main office, receive 250,000 won as the price for sexual traffic; and (b) had F, an employee of the said main office, receive the said main office as the price for sexual traffic; and (c) had F, an employee of the military unit in the Gosung-gun H, which was found to be the customer of the said main office; and (d) arranged sexual traffic by having F, a soldier on the name of the military unit

3. On August 2012, the Defendant received 250,000 won as the price for sexual traffic and arranged sexual traffic by having a F, an employee of the above main point, who was an employee of the said main point, receive 250,000 won as the price for sexual traffic, and have a male and female who was found to be a customer in the above main point, and arranged sexual traffic.

4. On August 2012, the Defendant: (a) received 250,000 won as the price for sexual traffic at the residence of Kman L, who is an employee of the said main office, from the said main office, and sought 250,000 won as the price for sexual traffic; and (b) arranged sexual traffic by having the said L and/or the said main office to be a customer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness M or F;

1. An interrogation protocol of F by prosecution;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. Application of detailed statement of financial transactions and statutes;

1. Articles 19 (1) 1 and 19 (1) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. and the Selection of Imprisonment with prison labor for criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. To file a report on the closure of the entertainment tavern operated by the Defendant, the frequency of brokerage of sexual traffic in this case is not so many, the Defendant has no previous convictions or any criminal records of suspended execution, and the Defendant has reported the closure of the business of entertainment taverns in this case.

arrow