Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On November 5, 2001, the Plaintiff processed and sold the Kimun-gun, etc. to a company established on the ground of Jeonan-gun C (hereinafter “instant site”).
At around 2012, the Defendant had increased the total project cost of KRW 1,334,00,000 for the purpose of securing the stability of fishery products and supplying vagabonds products ( KRW 400,000,000 for the military expenses of KRW 400,000,000 for the military expenses of KRW 534,000 for the military expenses of KRW 1,337,706,00 for the final project cost of KRW 537,706,00 for the sake of securing the stability of fishery products and supplying vagabonds products. However, during the process of the above project, the total project cost of KRW 1,37,706,00 for the sake of increasing the final project cost, and accordingly, the self-
(A) The “B business” (hereinafter referred to as the “instant business”) carried out the instant business “B” and selected the Plaintiff on February 21, 2012.
B. The Plaintiff, a business operator of the instant case, decided to newly construct a processed factory and a cooling warehouse in part of the instant site. To this end, the Plaintiff commenced the said new construction on October 16, 2012 and completed the said new construction on June 18, 2013, and operated the said factory until now.
In that process, the Plaintiff received subsidies of KRW 800,000,000 from the Defendant on February 8, 2013 and KRW 400,000 on June 20, 2013, respectively, and received subsidies of KRW 800,00,000.
C. However, on April 13, 2017, D, the representative of the Plaintiff, was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for not less than one year and six months for violating the Act on the Management of Fraud and Subsidies for the following criminal facts in the case No. 2017Kadan125 of the Gwangju District Court Decision 2017.
Defendant
D In collusion with E, a construction business operator, from October 2012 to June 2013, 2013, even though it received KRW 20,000,000,000, not as the cost of construction, in collusion with E, a construction business operator, in carrying out a subsidy business, was not executed as scheduled, but as if it were normally paid, by falsely preparing and submitting documents and tax invoices related to construction as if it were normally paid, and thereby receiving KRW 76,80,00,000 for subsidies by deceiving the armed forces, and by the same method, 60,000.