beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for eight months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is a person who constructs hanok.
Defendant
A and Defendant B had been aware that Defendant A had built Han-ok’s house owned by Defendant B (the completion of February 2, 2009) on the total floor area of 85.38 square meters in Namnam-gun, Namnam-gun, with the knowledge that Defendant A was not eligible for subsidies related to the construction of Han-ok, and the Defendants were willing to newly construct Han-style house in the name of another person with the knowledge that he was not eligible for subsidies
1. According to the guidelines for the preservation of hanok-do and the implementation of the construction project, Defendant A attempted to acquire subsidies by leasing F’s name in order to receive the subsidy, even though he was aware that the Plaintiff did not have resided in the housing construction project for which KRW 20 million and KRW 20 million were subsidized, and that it did not have been subject to subsidies for at least one year in the Do as of the date of application related to the construction project of hanok-do, which was supported by the Do and KRW 20 million in the Do, and that it was not subject to subsidies.
Around June 29, 2009, the Defendant received subsidies of KRW 24 million from the head of the Gun/Gu of the Republic of Korea on June 29, 2009 and received subsidies of KRW 16 million in total from around October 20, 2010 and received subsidies of KRW 40 million from the head of the Gun/Gu of the Republic of Korea on June 29, 2009, as the Defendant was the actual owner of Han-gun's hanok, and as the F was the actual owner of Han-gun's hanok, the Defendant submitted a letter of request for advance payment for preservation and new construction of Han-gun's hanok, a letter of commitment, a written request for payment, a plan for advance payment, and a plan for advance payment.
2. Defendant B, in accordance with the guidelines for the preservation of Han-do’s hanok and the implementation of the construction project, was aware that the Defendant had already received one-time subsidy related to the construction project of Han-do and the construction project of Han-do’s 20 million won and the Gun’s 20 million won, and was not entitled to any more than a subsidy, and was aware of the fact that he had not received a subsidy, Defendant B had the intention to borrow the subsidy by building the Han-do’s total floor area of 96.12m2 square meters to the Gun I in the
The defendant is the defendant, on June 29, 2009, Southern-gun around 29.