logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2016.02.18 2015도19716
건축법위반등
Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and records, the lower court, on the grounds stated in its reasoning, committed a violation of the Building Act due to an unauthorized change of use and a violation of the Public Sanitation Control Act due to the operation of an unreported lodging business, has substantive

The decision is just, and there is no error in the misapprehension of legal principles as to concurrent crimes as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

In addition, the argument that the judgment of the court below is erroneous in the deliberation of facts on the premise of sentencing and the mistake of facts is ultimately an unfair argument for sentencing.

Accordingly, under Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in the case where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment with or without prison labor for not less than ten years has been imposed, an appeal is permitted based on unfair grounds for sentencing. As such, the argument that the amount of punishment is unfair is not a legitimate ground for appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

arrow