The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

In light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court’s judgment that found the Defendant guilty of the part of the facts charged in the instant case at Busan District Court 2017 High Order 5960 on the grounds stated in its reasoning did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on joint principal offenders, contrary to what is alleged

In addition, in light of the records, the judgment below, which calculated the amount of additional collection of 2,190,00 won from the Busan District Court 2017 High Court 3064, 2017 High Court 2017 High Court 6452 High Court 2,00,000 among the facts charged in the instant case, did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles on the deliberation failure or additional collection, contrary

The argument that has failed to examine the conditions of sentencing is ultimately an unfair argument of sentencing.

According to Article 383 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment with or without prison labor for not less than ten years is imposed, an appeal shall be allowed on the grounds of unfair sentencing.

In this case where a more minor sentence is imposed against the defendant, the argument that the punishment is too unreasonable is not a legitimate ground for appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.