logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.10.20 2014가단233808
손해배상
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 30,000,000 as well as 5% per annum from December 3, 2011 to October 20, 2015 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition 1) On November 19, 201, the Defendant, along with the Plaintiff, known at the Internet community site on November 19, 201, went through alcoholic beverages, and then, the Defendant: (a) told the Plaintiff that “I am out of the telecom without holding any knife; (b) I am out of the first car; (c) led the Plaintiff’s hand, pushed the Plaintiff’s body, pushed the Plaintiff’s sexual intercourse with 407 located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; (b) the Defendant got into sexual intercourse with the Plaintiff on November 20, 201, and led the Plaintiff to sexual intercourse once.

3) 피고는 2011. 11. 20. 새벽경 위 모텔에서 도망가려는 원고의 반항을 억압한 후 1회 더 간음하여 강간하였다. 4) 피고는 2011. 11. 24. 17:47경 자신을 강간으로 고소한 원고에게 휴대전화로 ‘마지막 기회를 버리셨어 ㅋㅋㅋ 카카오는 이미 캡쳐 해놔써 ㅋㅋ 변호사랑 상담했더니 당신 죄목이 최소 4개야 당신 부모님께도 다 말씀드릴테니 기다려’라는 문자를 보내는 등 그때부터 2011. 12. 3.까지 별지 범죄일람표 기재와 같이 총 20회에 걸쳐 불안감을 조성하는 문언을 반복적으로 원고에게 도달하게 하였다.

5) The Defendant was convicted of two years of imprisonment with prison labor for the rape and the creation of uneasiness against the Plaintiff, and the said judgment became final and conclusive. [The purport of each description of evidence A and evidence Nos. 1 and 2 as well as the whole arguments

B. The Defendant is obligated to compensate the Plaintiff for damages caused by the tort, since the Defendant committed a tort in which the Plaintiff had sexual intercourse twice and raped the Plaintiff and sent letters creating uneasiness over 20 times.

2. Scope of liability for damages

A. 1) The Plaintiff and the Defendant came to know at the Internet community site around October 201, and exchanged with each other, and they drink with each other on November 19, 201. 2) The Plaintiff got rape from the Defendant and got out of the Defendant’s mobile phone.

arrow