logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2016.11.11 2016고단1453
상습절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for five years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power】 The Defendant is a person who has been sentenced to criminal punishment five times for the same crime, and juvenile protective disposition three times for the same crime, such as imprisonment for a violation of the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes Act (thief), for two years at the Daegu High Court on September 14, 1994, for two years at the Daegu District Court on December 16, 1996, for three years at the Changwon District Court on December 17, 1998, for three years at the Changwon District Court on September 199, for one year and six months at the Daegu District Court on September 19, 208.

【Habitually, from June 4, 2015 to June 17:20, 2015, the Defendant abused the victim E’s house located in Gyeongnam-gun, Namnam-gun from around 17:00 to around 17:20, and then invaded the victim’s house between his house and his house. The Defendant abused the victim’s house with an object of totaling KRW 700,000,000 at the market price, including one gold-half of the total market price of KRW 200,000,000, which is kept in the front door of the bank.

The Defendant habitually intrudes on the house of victims 45 times in total, including the list of crimes (1) in the following manner, from April 1, 2016 until April 14:00, and steals the total market value of 51,841,000 won owned by the victims, from that time to April 1, 2016, and steals the same year.

1. The same year from around 26.

4. Until January 2, 201, the victims’ house was invaded by the victim’s house more than six times in total, as shown in the annexed list of crimes (2), and thus, the victims did not have to find stolen goods but did not commit an attempted crime.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually stolens the victims' property 45 times in total, and attempted to steals the victims' property at least six times in total, and infringed upon the victims' residence over 51 times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The statement of the police officer made to F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, andO;

1. E, P, Q, R, R, C, U, V, W, X, Y, Z, AAB, AC, AD, AE, AE, AF, AH, AI, AK, AK, AM,N, AO, or AO.

arrow