1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The plaintiff asserted that he met Defendant B by introducing D, a workplace partner, around April 2007, but met Defendant B, and around that time, he entered into a sexual relationship with Defendant B by force. Since early May 2007, the plaintiff started to come to come to a school on the premise of marriage with Defendant B, but he entered into a sexual relationship with Defendant B on the basis of excessive sexual desire.

On November 11, 2007, the defendant C, the mother of the defendant B, was unilaterally scheduled to leave the job E, who was accompanying the plaintiff, to leave the job.

However, the Defendant C unilaterally declared the Plaintiff’s marriage by unilaterally opposing the Defendant C’s father’s sexual intercourse after completing the Plaintiff’s religious opinion with the Plaintiff’s parents.

After the marriage, the plaintiff was unable to live a normal life due to after-the-counter stress disorder, and the newly employed workplace around 2009 was still out of work, and there has been a new relation until now.

On November 1, 2013, six years later, the Plaintiff came to know that the reason for the above-mentioned marriage was due to the Plaintiff’s parents and the book that Defendant C, not F, did not have the mind, in the form that the Plaintiff demanded F to have had suffered from the pain.

Therefore, the Plaintiff was subject to serious insult on the grounds that the Plaintiff demanded the Defendant B to go with the company, but the Plaintiff was able to receive family education, such as “brenick snick,” and “does so receive family education.”

Therefore, the Defendants are jointly and severally liable to compensate for damages arising from the above illegal acts, ① to pay the Plaintiff the total of KRW 112,887,350, including the daily income, and the amount of medical expenses such as depression, ② to each Plaintiff the consolation money of KRW 50,00,000, and the delay damages therefrom.

2. Determination of the Defendants around 2007 the Plaintiff and Defendant B’s marriage ceremony.