(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.01.15 2014고단2541

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.01.15 2014고단2541

부정수표단속법위반

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2014 Highest 2541] From June 13, 1998, the Defendant entered into a contract with the National Bank of Korea and entered into a check with the National Bank of Korea, and traded household checks.

On March 21, 2014, the Defendant issued one copy of the above bank bank check in the name of the Defendant named as Eunpyeong-gu Seoul E building, the first floor “F” office, the check number “G”, the check amount “3,00,000,000”, and the date of issuance “F, June 24, 2014.” On June 24, 2014, the holder of the check presented the above check to the bank bank branch of Korea on June 24, 2014 when the payment was made, but the Defendant did not receive the shortage of deposit.

The Defendant, including that, from around that time to May 16, 2014, issued the amount equivalent to KRW 25,500,000 in the total amount of nine face value of the household check nine times in the same manner as indicated in the attached Table Nos. 1 to 9 of the daily list of crimes at the above office, and proposed payment within the period for which payment was made by the holders, but did not receive each payment as a disposition of shortage of deposits and suspension of transactions.

[2014 Highest 3078]

1. On May 28, 2014, the Defendant issued one check number “H,” the check amount “H,” “2,00,000,000,” and one check issued by the Defendant under the name of the Defendant as “the date of issuance”. On September 14, 2014, the holder of the check presented a proposal to pay the check on September 15, 2014, when it was within the time limit for payment, to pay the check, but the Defendant did not receive the suspension of transaction.

2. On June 12, 2014, the Defendant issued a copy of the check number “I”, “3,00,000 won”, “3,000 won”, and “date of issuance” under the name of the Defendant, and on October 12, 2014, the holder of the check presented the check to the Bank’s affiliated branch of the Bank of Korea on October 13, 2014, which is the time limit for payment, but the Defendant did not receive the suspension of transaction.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The defendant;

유사 판례

-부산지방법원 2013.01.23 2012고단6416

-부산지방법원 2013.02.07 2012고단5621

-의정부지방법원 2013.08.29 2012고정793

-수원지방법원 2014.09.17 2014고단959

-부산지방법원 2015.01.16 2014고정1690