The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the fact that the defendant led to each of the instant crimes under the influence of alcohol, the degree of damage by the victimized police officers is minor, and the defendant reimburses the repair cost of the damaged patrol vehicle, etc., the punishment sentenced by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. Taking account of the circumstances alleged by the Defendant, the instant crime is committed: (a) the Defendant driven a vehicle under the influence of alcohol by 0.153%; (b) the Defendant was exposed to the use of his mobile phone while driving the vehicle to the victim G (hereinafter “victim G”) affiliated with the F department of the macro police station; (c) broken the glass of the Defendant’s driving vehicle due to his left elbbow, and fright off the vehicle; and (d) Chewing the studs in the vehicle; (c) the victimized police officer opened the front door of the Defendant’s driver’s seat and prevented the Defendant’s behavior; and (d) the Defendant went beyond the 0th anniversary of his body of the damaged police officer; and (d) the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for more than 10 years, and then 20 years, 20 years, 20 years, 3 years, 3 years, and 10 days, 3 years, 4 days, 200, and 10,000.