logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2014.08.20 2014고단1694
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 17, 2014, the Defendant, at around 06:14, committed obstruction of performance of official duties, on the ground that the Defendant, at around 06:14, carried out smartphones in possession of D and carried out her own horses on the front road of the same Gu F, on the ground that, at around 06:24 on the same day, the Defendant was able to take a her seat along with a slope D, a police officer belonging to the Seoul Mine Police Station C District, a police officer belonging to the Seoul Mine Police Station, who was called out after receiving the 112 report by a taxi engineer that the Defendant did not pay taxi expenses.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reports and maintenance of order by police officers.

2. Around 06:35 on the same day, the Defendant said that there was a police officer B and B, a police officer of the Seoul Mine Police Station C district located in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, that “I am the victim H, a police officer of the same district border, “I am the victim’s face of the same year.”

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each written statement prepared D, H and B;

1. A complaint filed for the preparation of H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on a shoulder cell phone;

1. Selection of each fine in light of the relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts and the choice of punishment under Articles 136(1), 311, and 306 of the Criminal Act, and there are no previous criminal records of a fine of this kind other than once every year, and the degree of violence and obstruction of performance of official duties cannot be deemed significant, and the fact that a mistake is recognized and that no second offense is committed, etc., the selection of each fine is made;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow