A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On January 18, 2018, at around 02:20, the Defendant’s “Esing room” in the “Esing room” located in Busan Dong-gu, Busan, for the following reasons: (a) the Defendant: (b) reported to the G (hereinafter “G security”) to which the F police box sent by a customer upon receipt of a 112 report and sent to the customer; and (c) the Defendant: (d) erred within the meaning of “G security guards.”

“Along with sound, bucking a drinking, placing the chest of G several times due to its head, and assaulting the G by walking the buckbucks.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement made on the H and G circumstances;

1. Application of the investigation report (1) and each photograph/cinematographic output statute;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the option of punishment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [the scope of the recommended sentence] The grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act are as follows: (a) the basic area (six months to one year and six months shall interfere with the performance of official duties) (the decision of the sentenced sentence] according to the sentencing guidelines; (b) the defendant has a history of having been sentenced to the suspension of indictment for each of the charges of joint assaulting the same kind in 2010; (c) the defendant has been under the suspicion of joint assaulting the same kind in 2013; and (d) the fact that there is no history of criminal punishment; and (e) the fact that there is