1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. The following facts may be acknowledged if there is no dispute between the parties, or if the whole purport of the pleadings is added to the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 19, and 20 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply):

(1) The Defendant’s status (i.e., construction of a new construction of a new construction of the high-speed high-speed D Tools and other construction works (hereinafter “instant construction”) that may be considered below.

(i) is a contracting agency that has ordered the Act;

See The plaintiffs are companies that receive and execute the instant construction works or their employees.

Specific status shall be as follows:

Plaintiff

주식회사 A(이하 ‘A’이라 한다),원고 쌍용건설 주식회사,원고 코오롱글로벌 주식회사,회생채무자 성원산업개발 주식회사 ⇒ 이상의 4개 회사는 이 사건 공사를 공동수급한 시공사들(이하 위 회사들을 통합하여 지칭할 때는 ‘시공사’라 한다)이다.

Plaintiff

회생채무자 성원산업개발 주식회사의 관리인 B ⇒ 위 회생채무자가 2011. 4. 6. 수원지방법원 2010회합17호로 회생계획인가를 받으면서 선임된 관리인으로서, 뒤에서 보게 되는 이 사건 벌점부과처분의 상대방이 됨에 따라 이 사건 소송의 원고가 되었다

(이하 이 사건 원고 중 한명인 위 관리인과 위 회생채무자 회사를 구분하지 않고 원고 또는 시공사로 지칭한다). 원고 C ⇒ 원고 A의 현장대리인이다.

B. (1) On May 4, 2013, around 10:03, the Plaintiffs are all the type of softers, namely, “ck Hak Hak Hak Hak and Mak Mak Mak Hak” in the course of performing the work of installing a new construction for the high-speed high-speed rail D (hereinafter “instant work”), which is one process of construction, such as the construction of the new construction for the high-speed high-speed high-speed rail D (hereinafter “instant work”).

The equipment associated with this accident shall be two infrastructure Co., Ltd.