logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.11.23 2016고정1231
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was a person who had the delivery employee from May 2015 at the “Dcafeteria” of the victim C’s operation located in Ansan-si.

1. On June 1, 2015, the Defendant received KRW 3,300,000,000 from the victim’s beliefing that “The Defendant was receiving treatment of Samsung Medical Center hospitalization from the Defendant’s cancer, and there is no treatment charge. It is soon possible to repay the loan through the loan out of the loan to the Defendant’s mother F’s account.” The Defendant received KRW 300,000,000 from the victim’s beliefing that “The Defendant would immediately repay the loan to the Defendant’s F’s account.”

However, the facts have been two years since the Defendant she saw with his wife and her child and became aware of her consciousness, so there was no fact that the Defendant her children received hospital treatment as above, and the Defendant made a false statement in order to borrow money to the victim as she was in need of other living expenses due to the overdue charge of the mobile phone, and there was no economic ability to repay this at the time of this case.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim and defrauds the above 3.3 million won.

2. On July 12, 2015, the Defendant borrowed money from the victim at the above restaurant, stating that “A child E transferred from the Samsung Medical Center and died of an operation at the G Hospital, but no funeral expenses exist.” The Defendant borrowed money from the victim who believed it to “D,” and received KRW 1 million from the victim to the same account as the same day prior to the same day, and KRW 500,000,000 from the same account around the 17th of the same month.

However, in fact, the Defendant was hospitalized as stated in Paragraph 1 and died, and there was no need for hospitalization or funeral expenses, and there was no economic ability to repay the borrowed money.

Accordingly, the defendant was given the above 1.5 million won by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Details of deposit transactions;

arrow