A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant,

1. Around December 12, 2007, the defendant had been residing in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 101 Dong 701 Dong 701, who had had the victim D with the knowledge of the fact through the parents' meeting of the elementary school that she had been going to go to her, and the victim D with the burden of re-afluencing "if he had no money during the course of lending 30 million won to her mother and her mother, she would have borrowed her money, he/she would have borrowed her to return her to her own, and he/she would pay 450,000 won per month interest (per 50,000 won per month)", and the victim who is believed to do so would have received her money in the form of loan from the victim who believed to have it as it is.

2. On February 208, 2008, the victim stated that “I would pay 600,000 won (two parts) each month with borrowed money at a time when I borrowed money from the victim at a place in the name of the police officer. I received 30,000 won from the victim who believed that I would like to do so.” The victim was transferred to the bank account in the name of the defendant at that time.

그러나 사실 피고인은 당시 40대 초반의 전업 가정주부로서 일정한 직업이나 수입이 없었고, 지난 1991년경 사회 저명인사이던 유부남 E과 만나 교제해오다가 2000년경 아들을 출산하였고, E으로부터 매달 200만 원 정도의 생활비를 받았으나 충분하지 아니하여 주변의 지인 등을 상대로 낮은 이율로 돈을 빌려 높은 이율로 돈을 빌려주는 이른바 사채놀이를 하면서 그 차액 상당의 수익으로 아들 양육비 등을 포함한 생활비에 보탰으나, 수중에 현금 등의 여유자금이나 원리금 상환 등과 관련하여 즉시 현금화가 가능한 유동자산이 달리 없었을 뿐만 아니라, 2003~2004년경에 지인 F에게 빌려준 1억 5,000만 원의 원리금 회수가 제대로 되지 아니하면서 자금 사정이 급격하게 나빠지게 되었고, 2007. 2.경에 지인 G에게 1억 원을 빌려주었으나 그 원리금...