The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. misunderstanding of facts and misunderstanding of legal principles are only those of the beer disease for the purpose of beer and beer after the victim's head was taken, so it does not constitute assault the victim by carrying dangerous articles.

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. As to the assertion of mistake of facts and misapprehension of legal principles, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, namely, ① C and G at the time of the instant case with only one hand present the victim’s head debt, and consistently testified from the investigative agency to the court of the court below since the witnessing the situation citing the beer disease; ② the victim did not confirm whether the Defendant used the beer disease at the time of the Defendant’s head debt. However, he stated that the Defendant’s head debt at the time of the Defendant’s occurrence of the beer’s escape. However, he stated that the Defendant was highly likely to have used the beer disease at the time of the victim’s head debt. ③ At the time of the investigation by the prosecutor’s office, the Defendant cannot be seen as harming the victim’s head because it was considerably satisfying, even though he was not satisfying.”

Therefore, this part of the defendant's argument is without merit.

B. There are favorable circumstances such as the Defendant’s agreement on the assertion of unfair sentencing with the victim.

However, the crime of this case refers to beer and beer who is dangerous to the defendant.