1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

A. The reasoning for the court’s explanation in this case is as follows: ① The defendant was found to have been dismissed on December 15, 2016 in the appellate court from “2016Nu46528” from “3 15 and 16 of the judgment of the first instance court; and the appellate court was dismissed on April 28, 2017 (Seoul High Court 2016Nu46528); ② the court of final appeal was dismissed on April 7, 2017 without hearing (Supreme Court 2017Du32951). Each “the notice of this case” of “the first instance court 1 and the first instance court 5 of the judgment of the first instance,” “the first instance court 1 and the first instance court 5 of the judgment of the first instance court 1 and the first instance court 1 and 5 of the first instance judgment against “the first instance court 1 and the first instance court 5 of the first instance judgment.”

B. In addition, the following circumstances that can be acknowledged in light of the overall purport of the arguments on the facts and evidence, namely, ① the Defendant’s instant notification was made not due to the Plaintiff’s fault or negligence in performing his duties but due to the Plaintiff’s refusal to enter into an annual salary system as an annual salary which is merely part-time lecturer fees, and ② the Plaintiff was a teacher for about seven years from September 1, 2007 that was newly appointed to the Defendant to the date of the instant notification, and his work performance was faithfully performed for the seven years from September 1, 2007.