1. The plaintiffs' appeal and the remaining defendants' appeal except the defendant A are all dismissed.

2...

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: the "State of the Republic of Korea" of the 9th judgment of the court of first instance is as "the name of the party to the correction of indication" of the 11th "name of the party to the correction of indication" of the 14th judgment as "name of the party to the correction of indication and the party to the lawsuit" of the 14th judgment as "name of the party to the correction of indication" of the 922 subparagraph 6 and 7 of the 14th "No. 922 subparagraph 6, 7, and No. 923 subparagraph 1 and 114 of the 923." The 3rd and 14th 15th 3rd 3rd 3rd 16th 3 through 7th 16th 4th 11th 4th 2nd 3rd 4th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 20 of the 3rd 3rd 20th 2.

2. In conclusion, the part concerning the plaintiffs' limited claims listed in the separate sheet No. 1 among the assessment judgment of this case is justified and authorized, and the part concerning the defendants' limited claims shall be changed to 0 won by unfairly changing the amount of limited claims into '0 won'. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion and the appeal by the defendants other than the plaintiffs' appeal and defendant A is dismissed in its entirety as it is without merit.

However, according to the litigation process of Defendant BJ, BK, BL, BM, and BN, the part against the network BO in the judgment of the first instance shall be modified as described in paragraph (3) of this Article.