beta
Text
1. On December 23, 2014, the Defendant confirms that an action for dismissal of the CWelfare Facility taken against the Plaintiff is null and void.
2...
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. C Welfare Center (hereinafter “Welfare Center”) is a welfare facility for the aged under Article 36(1)1 of the Act on the Law of the Aged (hereinafter “Welfare Welfare Facility”) and Article 36(1)1 of the Act on the Law of the Aged (hereinafter “Welfare Welfare Facility”) as follows:
1. A welfare center for older persons: A welfare facility for older persons established pursuant to the facilities that provide various information and services to older persons for their hobbies, hobby activities, social activities, etc. and that provide them with services necessary for promotion of health, prevention of diseases, guarantee of income, home welfare, and promotion of welfare for older persons, and D entrusts the management and operation of a welfare center to the Defendant during the period from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2016.
B. On January 2, 2014, the Plaintiff was appointed from the Defendant as the head of a welfare center and served as the head of the facility.
C. On January 2014 and February 2, 2014, the Plaintiff, who was newly employed in the welfare center, was paid with salary grade 1, and was re-defined by salary grade 5 on or around March 2014 on the ground that he had a social welfare facility career or a similar career, was re-defined by salary grade 5, and was paid retroactively to the unpaid portion among the 1 and February salary, and received the benefits corresponding to salary grade 5 from that time until August 201.
In addition, the employees working in the welfare center have received treatment improvement expenses (less than three years: KRW 90,00, KRW 120,000 for more than three years, KRW 120,000 for less than five years: KRW 150,000, KRW 1500 for more than five years, and KRW 150,000 for those who have worked in the welfare center) depending on their work experience.
E. Around June 2014, the Plaintiff changed the name of the official seal used by the welfare center from “C Welfare Center Representative” to “C Welfare Center” to “C Welfare Center” and used the above seal in a document, etc. sent under the name of the welfare center.
F. D As a result of the inspection of the actual state of operation of a welfare center from August 27, 2014 to August 28, 2014, the Plaintiff was given a salary class without proof of a social welfare facility career or similar career.