logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2014.04.30 2013고단3571
강제추행등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 20:00 on November 1, 2013, the Defendant demanded the victim to move together in the telecom before the “Manmanium” in Kimpo-si’s North change, but refused this request, the Defendant: (a) was slicking the victim’s head knife; (b) was kneeing the victim’s head knife; (c) was knee and skneing the victim’s right knee and sknife on a hand; and (d) caused two-day injury to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement on C, D, E, and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order

1. The summary of the facts charged in this part of the charges is that the Defendant committed an indecent act by force against the victim by putting the victim’s chests together with the victim C (n, 45 years of age) at “Sturinium” (hereinafter “Sturinium”) on November 1, 2013, when Kimpo-si’s change in North Korea, and singing together with the victim’s chests several times, and only talks with the victim’s sound.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the record of judgment, namely, ① the Defendant sent AC from the above G G G G G G G G G GG to the time of this court to the time of this court, and the Defendant stated that he sent AC at the time of time to the above G G G GG, and the victim made a statement that he sent AC at the time of this court that he sent AC to the G G G G GG, and that he was partly identical with the Defendant. In light of the fact that the Defendant made a statement in this court that he sent AC at the time of time, he was running the business of sending AC in return for money, and there is doubt that the victim was an employee who sent AC at the request of the Defendant, ② the Defendant was the victim's chest at the sing room, and her son was danced, but during that process, the Defendant made assault or intimidation to the extent that the victim could make it difficult to resist.

arrow