Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 3,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 22, 2016, at around 11:30, the Defendant: (a) divided into a horse dispute with the victim B in connection with the auction of the victim B and corporeal movables; and (b) committed an injury to the victim’s spawn and tension that requires approximately three weeks of treatment by spawning the victim’s spawn; and (c) spawning the victim’s ebbb; and (d) spawning the victim’s ebbblance with the victim’s eblick.

2. Defendant B set up against the act of the victim A at the same time, at the same time and place as above 1.3 weeks, the Defendant 2 dumpeded the victim’s sulbage with sulbage, and sulped the victim’s sule, thereby causing approximately three weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s partial statement in the court - The Defendant asserted to the effect that he was unilaterally in contact with B - However, it cannot be viewed that the Defendant believed that the Defendant exercised tangible force to B as in the facts charged, and that the degree of injury as in the judgment in the judgment in B cannot be seen as false considering the fact-finding results, etc. with respect to the pertinent medical hospital conducted by the full bench.

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. The result of the fact-finding on G family department, clinic and central hospital in this court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (including the selection of fines for negligence, the degree of each injury is relatively minor, and the mutual agreement is reached, and various circumstances shown in the records and pleadings are considered);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;