(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.10.20 2016고정574

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.10.20 2016고정574

상해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 18, 2015, at the front of the D restaurant located in Macheon-si C on June 21, 2015, the Defendant: (a) complained of the victim E’s complaint that the Defendant was traveling along the cream “influent relationship with the U.S. F.,” and (b) followed it by the victim; (c) caused the victim’s injury, such as catitis, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, by putting the victim’s scke at hand and with dub hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The defendant asserts that the victim was in contact with the victim, and that there was no time for the victim as described in the facts charged. However, according to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court, the defendant and the victim were found to have taken a bath to each other at the time when the defendant and the victim were arrested as a flagrant offender, and the defendant was found to have committed assault, such as 5 to 6 times when he was arrested as a flagrant offender and she was investigated by the police station, when he was investigated by the police station, when he was arrested as a flagrant offender, she was found to have taken a bath to the victim’s face part, and breath and flath, etc., (3) the photograph taken by the police station immediately after the occurrence of a large number of parts in the victim’s face, and (4) the injury diagnosis certificate was issued to the effect that another person was damaged by a light of the victim’s breath, etc. In full view of the facts charged in this case, the defendant’s assertion that the above facts charged in this case should be accepted.

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

참조조문

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2013.11.14 2013고단5690

-부산지방법원 2015.06.03 2014고정5417

-광주지방법원 2016.10.20 2016노1031

-인천지방법원 부천지원 2014.06.20 2013고정2305

-울산지방법원 2016.10.05 2016고단1426