The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the punishment (two months of imprisonment and ten months of imprisonment) imposed by the court below against the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. In light of favorable circumstances such as the fact that the defendant is led to confession and reflects on his family, and that the crime No. 1 and No. 2 of the judgment of the court below is in the relationship between the final crime in the judgment of the court below and the ex post facto concurrent crimes, or the fact that the defendant, who was sentenced to the suspension of the execution due to the same kind of crime, administered the penphone again on several months, and the defendant again was provided with the phonephones, the circumstance, time, the course, the course, the course of the administration of the penphones, etc., it is likely that the defendant may repeat again without the suspension of narcotics, and all the sentencing factors such as the defendant's age, character, character, environment, circumstances, etc., such as the defendant's age, character, and conduct, and circumstances after the crime, considering the fact that the execution of the judgment

Even if the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable, it is not judged that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.