logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.06.16 2016가합60293
소유권말소등기
Text

1. Of the instant lawsuit, the part concerning the claim for cancellation of the registration of transfer of ownership concerning the land indicated in attached Table No. 1, and

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Co., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “fluorium”) performed a new construction work with the permission of new construction of the building listed in the attached Table No. 2 (hereinafter referred to as “instant building,” including the instant site and the instant building, on the ground of C. C. 1453 square meters (hereinafter referred to as “instant site”), Jeju-si, with the permission of new construction of the building indicated in the attached Table No. 2 (hereinafter referred to as “instant building”). On February 12, 2009, he transferred the construction site including the instant site to Mai-Nam Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “ma”).

On November 17, 2016, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer on the ground of “the final and conclusive judgment based on the termination of the contract on October 8, 2009.” On July 10, 2014, the failed hotel sold the instant land and the instant building during the construction of the instant building to the Taedong hotel (hereinafter “ Taedong hotel”), and on December 10, 2014, the Taedong hotel sold the instant land and the instant building again to the Plaintiff on December 10, 2014. Meanwhile, on the other hand, on the instant building, on the instant building, on the application for provisional attachment by the Case Rour (hereinafter “Daun Roil Pream”), the provisional attachment decision (Daju District Court Decision 2015Ka405) issued on February 12, 2016, and on the date of the provisional attachment registration, the registration of ownership transfer became final and conclusive on the ground of the Plaintiff’s entrustment of the provisional attachment registration.”

On October 31, 2016, 2016, 2016, 2010. The Plaintiff sold the right to claim the transfer of ownership on the instant building to the Plaintiff.

The Plaintiff did not complete the registration of transfer in its future with respect to the instant land purchased as above and the right to claim ownership transfer of the instant building.

B. On November 16, 2016, the Plaintiff and the Defendant (former Company B) entered into a joint agreement with respect to the instant real estate (hereinafter “instant agreement”).

(e).

arrow