Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, with respect to the defendant B, it shall be for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants, along with Defendant A’s wife, engage in the virtual sales business in the name of “G” from 18 to 18, Jung-gu, Seoul.

피고인들은 E과 공모하여 2014. 9. 13.경부터 2015. 4. 16.경까지 위 ‘G’ 매장에서 상표권자인 ‘루이비똥말레띠에’가 대한민국 특허청에 상표등록한 ‘LOUIS VUITTON' 등의 위조 상표가 부착된 지갑 3점, 카드지갑 5점, ‘샤넬’이 상표등록한 ‘CHANEL’ 등의 위조 상표가 부착된 가방 1점, 지갑 2점, ‘헤르메스앵떼르나씨오날’이 상표등록한 ‘HERMES' 등의 위조 상표가 부착된 지갑 2점 등 정품가격 14,090,000원 상당의 제품을 판매할 목적으로 보관하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Entry of the suspect interrogation protocol of the prosecution E in the protocol;

1. Entry of the police seizure record;

1. Each description or image of the seized site photograph, seized object photograph, cellular phone photographic picture, camera, salton, and copy of the account book;

1. Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes of three copies of the trademark register, a written appraisal (including a list of calculation of prices of goods), and a report on investigation (report on calculation of prices of goods);

1. Defendants: Articles 93 and 30 of the Trademark Act and the choice of punishment concerning facts constituting the crime: The Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment, respectively;

1. Defendants among concurrent crimes: former part of Article 37, Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendant B of a suspended execution: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B on probation: Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc.;

1. Defendant A: Reasons for sentencing under Article 97-2 (1) of the Trademark Act;

1. The circumstances favorable to Defendant A: The Defendant was at the Seoul Central District Court on March 5, 1992, in a case where: (a) the volume of infringing goods and the amount of damage are not significant solely for the instant crime; (b) the Defendant led to the confession of the instant crime and appears to repent his mistake; and (c) cooperation with the Defendant in the investigation.