logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.11.13 2019가합559632
교회분립무효확인의 소
Text

All of the instant lawsuits are dismissed.

The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. A dispute arises in the course of the recruitment of the pastors of the F church, and the head of the F church filed a lawsuit against the defendant's chairperson against the defendant's chairperson in the D General Assembly trial division (hereinafter "general assembly trial division"), and the decision of the general assembly court was rendered that the defendant's Furging resolution of the Furging Council should be invalidated.

B. On May 4, 2015, when the lawsuit for the above retrial was pending, the Defendant president prepared a protocol of compromise with the following: (a) the court’s decision was dissatisfied with the general assembly trial court’s request for a retrial to the general assembly trial court; and (b) the parties, including the Plaintiffs, such as J, the Defendant president, and I pastors, who are the former president of the F Educational Association, agree to the establishment of the F Educational Association at present and the F Educational Association at (tentative) OO intersection.

C. On August 28, 2015, the General Assembly Review and Trial Bureau rendered the following decisions regarding the foregoing case (hereinafter “General Assembly Review and Trial Bureau’s decision”).

1. The lawsuit in this case was concluded, such as a separate protocol of compromise, and its effect has occurred and terminated.

2.In accordance with the protocol of conciliation, the F Council shall be divided into two categories; the I Council shall restore the delegated pastors to the F Council; at the same time, shall be the delegated pastors of a church which leaves the F Council and is divided.

3. The division of the F church is managed by the defendant.

4. Both sides may not bring action against each other under the church law or under the social law.

On July 18, 2015 and August 2, 2015, the Defendant held a meeting of the subdivision committee and held a meeting to divide into the G church, and held a meeting on August 30, 2015. On August 30, 2015, the division of the G church was carried out, and at the time, the Plaintiffs, who were the armed forces of the F church, were also transferred to the G church.

E. The FIE merged with KIE and set the name of the church into HIE.

The plaintiffs were appointed again as members of the H church from May 201 to November 1, 2016, and the resolution was passed to return the plaintiffs to the Sil of the H church on November 5, 2017.

arrow