logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.11.11 2015가합32868
목사자격부존재확인등
Text

1. Of the instant lawsuit, the general meeting of the Plaintiffs, Defendant Incorporated Foundation, against the Defendants, against Defendant E.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiffs, who are parties, have been appointed by the Defendant’s labor association as a member of each central association and the G church, and have worked as the member of each of the above churches until March 9, 2015 in the case of Plaintiff A, and until November 28, 2012 in the case of Plaintiff B, who was subject to the dismissal and expulsion of a member of the said church.

Defendant Assembly is the highest voting authority and enforcement period of C, Defendant Union is the subordinate order of C, and Defendant E is the pastor belonging to Defendant Assembly.

B. On December 28, 2014, on the part of the Plaintiff’s convening of the Plaintiff Company A, the FJ held a temporary meeting in which eight of the nine incumbent members present at the meeting. According to the minutes of the temporary political party meeting prepared at the time, the clerk H sent the agenda, such as the petition for the dismissal of the teacher in office, but the Plaintiff, who was the teacher in office, read “I, I, I,” and closed the meeting. 2) On December 29, 2014, eight of the members of the F church, including I, including the eight of the members of the F church, including I, submitted the “written petition for the dismissal of a delegated pastor” and “written petition for the suspension of robbery rights” and “written petition for the removal of the Plaintiff.”

Accordingly, on January 14, 2015, at the first extraordinary session of the defendant's union, the defendant's union dealt with the petition of dismissal of this case as an administrative case, but the defendant's union organized seven members such as the pastor and the senior minister of the defendant's union and resolved to deal with the case with the settlement committee with the right of assignment.

3) On February 14, 2015, as a result of the investigation and hearing of opinions on February 14, 2015, the Settlement Commission decided to dismiss the Plaintiff as a member of the F church from the position of a member of the F church. The Defendant Union decided to dismiss the Plaintiff as a member of the F church. 4) On March 9, 2015, at the regular meeting of the Settlement Commission No. 11:00, the Settlement Commission reported the above decision from the Settlement Commission, and to determine the above decision.

hereinafter referred to as "the dismissal of this case".

arrow