A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On July 5, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment and one year of suspended execution due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (non-licensed driving) in the Jinwon District Court's Jinju branch on July 5, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 13, 2016, and is currently under suspended execution, and other crimes of violation of the Road Traffic Act (non-licensed driving) are three times, and five times more of the past record of the violation of the Road Traffic Act (non-licensed driving).

[Criminal facts]

1. On October 15, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking) and the Road Traffic Act (Dless Driving) and the Act on Guarantee of Compensation for Motor Vehicles: (a) on October 15, 2016, the Defendant driven, without a driver’s license, an E non-rocketing motor vehicle that is not covered by mandatory insurance at a distance of about 500 meters from the front of a daily sports center in the middle of the Jinju-si to the front of the D convenience point in the Jinju-si, while under the influence of alcohol of 0.101%.

2. On October 15, 2016, the Defendant: (a) was under the influence of drinking on the road front of the D convenience store located in Jinju-si, Jinju-si; and (b) was under the investigation conducted by the Jinju-si G District District in F at Jinju-si, Jinju-si; (c) was demanded by the slopeH affiliated with the said district unit to sign and affix a seal on the confirmation document and the statement report under the circumstances of the said driver; (d) without any authority to exercise, the said written confirmation and the statement report of the driver’s circumstances; and (e) made his/her own seal on the next page; and (e) submitted the said written confirmation and the statement report of the driver’s situation in the driver’s name column to a slope H, who is a police officer in charge, who may know that the said written confirmation and the statement of the driver’s license were duly established.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant, without authority, forged the confirmation letter and the circumstantial statement report of the driver in the name of I and exercised it respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of the accused by the prosecution;

1. A written statement of I;

1. Notification of the results of regulating driving of drinking and driving of drinking;