beta
Text
1. The Defendants jointly and severally pay to the Plaintiff KRW 101,575,342 and KRW 100,000,000,000.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On June 18, 2018, the Plaintiff, under Defendant C’s joint and several surety, lent KRW 100,000,000 to Defendant B Incorporated Partnership (hereinafter “Defendant Incorporated”) at interest rate of 2% per annum, and at interest rate of 31 December 31, 2018, and at interest rate of 20% per annum.
(hereinafter referred to as the above loans of this case). B
For the repayment of the instant loan, the Defendant Corporation transferred KRW 10,000,000 to the Plaintiff, according to the business agreement of August 2, 2018 on the Defendant Corporation, for the repayment of the instant loan. The Plaintiff received KRW 5,00,000,000 from D on April 30, 2019.
C. The Plaintiff and the Defendants decided to pay interest until December 31, 2018 to substitute for the Plaintiff’s use of the cards provided by the Defendant Corporation.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 4, purport of the whole pleadings
2. Determination
A. According to the above facts, the Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay to the Plaintiff 10,000,000 won with 20% interest rate for the agreed interest rate from January 1, 2019 to the date of full payment. 5,00,000 won received from the above D from the above D, with interest rate of 6,575,342 won (1,00,000,000 won) that was first appropriated for the interest rate of 6,575,342 won (1,00,000,000 won) from April 30, 2019, and the interest rate of 1,575,342 won is 1,57,342 won.
Therefore, the Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay to the Plaintiff 101,575,342 won with interest rate of 20% per annum from May 1, 2019 to the date of full payment.
B. As to this, Defendant C paid the Plaintiff’s investment in the Defendant Corporation, and the instant loan certificate (Evidence A 1) requires a formal loan certificate as a bankruptcy procedure takes place in the court.
this article argues that the preparation, delivery, etc. was made and made.
According to the evidence Nos. 1 through 4, it is recognized that the plaintiff was registered as a shareholder or director of the defendant corporation and used the defendant corporation card.