1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition of the plaintiff's assertion made by this court, and thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

2. Parts used or added;

A. 1) The second 8 degrees of the first instance judgment "Defendant B" shall be raised to "Defendant B". 2) The second 15 degrees of the second 15 degrees of the first instance judgment and the first 16 degrees of "Korea Land and Housing Corporation" shall be raised to "Korea Land and Housing Corporation".

3) The third 19th 19th 19th 1 of the judgment of the first instance is considered to be “paid”. 4) The fourth 6th 6th 6th 6th 10 judgment of the first instance is deemed to be “2/3”, and the fourth 9th 9 and the 10th 10th 10s “the ownership transfer registration” is deemed to be “the ownership transfer registration”.

5) The 7th day of the first instance judgment’s 6th day of the 6th instance judgment is “sales contract,” and the 6th day of the first instance judgment’s 8th day of the 6th instance judgment’s 6th day of the 6th day of the 19th instance judgment’s 6th day of the 6th day of the 19th day of the

7) The 6th 16th son of the judgment of the first instance is regarded as “the same”. B. 1) The Plaintiff asserts that there was no direct signature and seal on the instant sales contract, and that there was no fact that the Plaintiff sold the 6th son of this case.

In light of the following circumstances, in addition to the aforementioned evidence, the Plaintiff was accompanied by the evidence Nos. 7 and Nos. 10 and 11 (including a serial number) as of the time of the preparation of the instant sales contract (the Plaintiff did not appear at the site at the time of the preparation of the instant sales contract, and this was confirmed through a statement made by a DNA investigation agency. However, D testified that the instant sales contract was prepared at the first instance court in the presence of the Plaintiff and E, etc.), and the Plaintiff was directly holding the copy of the sales contract (No. 10-2) after the instant sales contract was concluded.