The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff, including expenses incurred by supplementary participation.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this part of the judgment of the court of first instance is that it rejected the statement of evidence Nos. 18 through 20, which is insufficient to acknowledge the plaintiff’s assertion as evidence submitted additionally in the court of first instance, and that it is identical to the part concerning the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance in addition to the part to be rejected or added in paragraph (2). Thus, this part is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article

2. Each of the 2nd 9 to 10 vehicles, 16 vehicles, 2nd 9 to 10 vehicles, and 16 vehicles, “Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”)” as “Defendant Company.”

The second 12th “Visits medical treatment” and “Visits bathing” shall be deleted.

The 2nd 17th 18, 18, 5th 9, 6th 14th 15, 18, 7th 2, 11th 2, 8th 1st 1, 9-8, 9th 9, and 14th 3th 17th 17, 5th 9, and 14th 14th 3th 3th 3th 3th 3th 200

The witness I of the 4th six parallel shall be appointed as the witness I of the first instance trial.

Each “Defendant” in the 5th 11th 15th , 15, 16, 17, 19, and 6th 8th 8th , shall be brought to the Defendant and the Intervenor.

Part 6. The following shall be added to the 13th page:

Inasmuch as the Plaintiff asserts that the above liability for damages is “liability for negligence in the conclusion of a contract” but Article 535(1) of the Civil Act applies to cases where the contract is deemed null and void for the purpose of performance, which is an original impossibility, the contract is not seeking damages on the premise that the contract in this case is null and void, but seeking damages for breach of the Defendant’s duty of protection during the process of concluding the insurance contract in this case, the Plaintiff is entitled to seek damages for nonperformance or tort liability on the ground of breach of the duty of protection.

[1] Article 8 of the 8th 16th 16th 16th "Determination on the assertion of negligence in concluding a contract" is "Determination on the claim for damages caused by breach of the duty to protect."

The 9th 4th 15 parallels are as follows.