The crimes No. 1, No. 1, No. 2, and No. 1, No. 1, No. 2, and No. 2.

Punishment of the crime

On December 7, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with labor for interference with business, etc. in the Suwon District Court’s Ansan Branch, and completed the execution of a sentence after the lapse of the parole period on July 30, 2013 after the parole on June 28, 2013, which became final and conclusive on February 27, 2013.

1. Interference with business;

A. On March 2010, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s singing room business by force by avoiding disturbance, such as: (a) the victim J (at first time, 51 years old); (b) the victim did not comply with the victim’s demand to request a singing fee; and (c) the victim did not receive any more time for singing; and (d) the victim did not want to engage in smoking; (b) the victim’s refusal to engage in smoking, but (c) the victim want to be inside of funeral, and (d) the victim’s singing room.

B. On September 25, 2012, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s singing room business by force by avoiding disturbance, such as: (a) the victim would have heard the speech that the business was completed by the said victim’sJ; (b) the victim “I would know about Chewing and why he would know about;” and (c) walking the sway in front of the Kabr, and going beyond the will; and (d) obstructed the victim’s singing room business by force.

C. On March 2014, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s singinging business by force by avoiding disturbance to the victim, such as: (a) the victim was not able to take room on the ground that the victim did not appear because of his or her many customers; (b) the victim was “to prevent them from doing so; (c)” and (d) the victim’s singinging to the singinging to the singing to the singing to the singing to the singing to the sing to the singing to the singing to the sing to the sing

The Defendant, around August 25, 2014, in the singing room in the operation of the Victim M(M), located in I (M, 52 years of age) around 1, 2014, concluded that the victim would not drink, and that the victim would be “humpinging” to the victim. The Defendant, without permission, opened another door, and talked with other customers, such as “numing, stying, and stying”.