1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the Defendants shall be revoked, and the Plaintiff corresponding to that part shall be against the Defendants.

1. Grounds for a part of the judgment of the court of first instance to be stated in this case, and ① Grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance to be stated in this case;

(b) Paragraphs 1 (i) (Articles 3, 16, and 6, and 20) are cited as they are in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. (ii) The remainder of the reasons for the judgment of the first instance, i.e., third

B.2), paragraph 3 (3) (as seen in paragraphs 6, 21 to 11) (as seen in paragraph 2), is dismissed on the grounds of another conclusion.

2. The factual assertion in this part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is whether N was habitually abused from the plaintiff for several years (1) The factual assertion in this part constitutes a fact that has not been specifically specified and has not been embodied in the space, and thus, the defendants, claiming that there was no suspicion, bears the burden of presenting supporting the existence of such a fact, and the plaintiff may prove the falsity by means of impeachment of the credibility of the materials presented. In addition, in a case where the important part of the reported factual assertion is consistent with objective facts in light of the overall purport of the factual assertion, it cannot be viewed as a false fact even if there is a little difference from the truth or somewhat exaggerated expression. (2) In light of these legal principles, the factual assertion in this part of this case, including Nos. 2, 3, 5, 8, 9 (hereinafter referred to as “the factual assertion”), 3, 14, 1313, 14, 313, 314, or 14, 314, 314, or 314, etc. of the argument.