(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.09.21 2017고정216

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.09.21 2017고정216

도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who drives a rocketing vehicle owned by Trith Traffic in the course of business.

On March 18, 2017, around 16:35, the Defendant was driving the said vehicle in front of the long-distance of the Cheongnam-si, a U.S., a U.S., a U.S., and driving the said vehicle in front of the long-distance of the Cheongsung-si, a U.S., and driving the vehicle in front of the long-distance of the Cheongsung-si, and driving the vehicle in front of the new apartment.

At the time, the traffic flow of roads was in a smooth state, and in such a case, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to ensure that the driver of the motor vehicle obstructs the normal traffic flow of the motor vehicle in the lane that he/she intends to drive, and that the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to change the course safely.

Nevertheless, there was a neglect to change the course into one lane as it is, and there was a direct shift from one lane in the same direction.

2 Vehicle D(26 Do, South)'s right-hand tights conflict with the upper left-hand hicker of the vehicle under way D(26).

Defendant damaged 106,315 won at the market price of the 2nd vehicle repair cost due to the foregoing occupational negligence, and Defendant left the site without taking any measures despite the fact that the 2nd vehicle gets out of the 2nd vehicle and interfered with the normal traffic flow of other vehicles.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. D Legal statements;

1. The actual survey report and vehicle photograph;

1. Images by cutting a video CD or black booms;

1. Written estimate (the defendant and his/her defense counsel only moved to find a parking area for the handling of accidents and did not have any intention to leave the parking area;

The argument is asserted.

In full view of the foregoing evidence duly adopted and examined, especially the witness D’s legal statement and the results of the reproduction of video CDs, the Defendant told the Defendant to set the string of the vehicle driven by the victim as the inter-vehicle between the Defendant and the Defendant and set up the string of the string.

유사 판례

-청주지방법원 2018.04.17 2017고단1175

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.06.12 2017고단8481

-대구지방법원 서부지원 2017.09.13 2017고정510

-부산지방법원 동부지원 2017.09.20 2017고정669

-울산지방법원 2017.06.23 2017고정399