logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.06.22 2017가단127194
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Defendant B’s KRW 7,00,000 as well as 5% per annum from August 12, 2017 to June 22, 2018 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of premise;

가. D씨(D氏 땅이름을 말할 때는 ‘U’로 읽는다. ) 14세 휘(諱) 죽은 사람의 생전의 이름을 지칭할 때 사용한다.

E:E(hereinafter referred to as "F for convenience") is a ship's colonist who was ordered by G's city and H from the equitation of Joseon Thailand.

나. D씨세보상 D씨(이하 생략) 14세 F의 종통(宗統, 종가 맏아들의 혈통)은 이후 16세 I, 19세 J로 이어졌는데, J에게는 20세 K(큰 아들), L(둘째 아들), M, N의 네 아들이 있었다.

C. However, as K in 20 years of age 20 was required without marriage after marriage, L L 21 years of age O, P, Q, and R were adopted by K. The first P died without death after marriage, and the plaintiff in 34 years of age is third Q's lineal descendants.

On the other hand, S (Publication in 1923) among the DC's 19-year-old S (Publication in 1923) refers to T (T and J's first name) and two years-old L 20 years-old L 20 years-old L 20 years-old L 20 years-old Q 21 years-old L.

[Ground of recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap 1-3 evidence (including more than one number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. (i) The Plaintiff asserts that, although Defendant B’s claim against Defendant B was an end descendants leading to the 14 years of age F’s completion, Defendant B made a false statement that he was not the end descendants before the end descendants, and distributed a document that slanders the Plaintiff to the end members, thereby impairing the Plaintiff’s reputation, and thus seeking compensation for damages.

According to the Shelled Facts, the Plaintiff is a son of Q Q in Q Q, which was published in 1923 prior to the birth of the Plaintiff (the Plaintiff, who was born in 1930, entered that the paper was succeeded to 20 years old L L 21 years old Q. [It is difficult to conclude that the entries in Eul evidence 1 (including above numbers) alone are false, and rather, even V, which was prepared in 1850, was succeeded to the paper.]. The Plaintiff is a son of Q Q.

Abstract, however, the statements in Gap 19 and 23 and the testimony and arguments of the witness W.

arrow