The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Although the court below appears to have sufficiently taken into account such favorable circumstances as the defendant's mistake against himself/herself, there was no record of criminal punishment for the last 30 years, the crime of this case was committed in attempted attempts, and the defendant received a decision of bankruptcy or exemption from liability, the court below seems to have rendered a decision of unfair sentencing regarding the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing. In particular, the court below seems to have rendered a fine of a small amount taking into account the conditions of his/her stay in the country of co-defendant A, and taking into account the defendant's age, character and conduct, family environment, motive, means, method, and consequence of the crime of this case, and all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, including the circumstances before and after the crime, etc., the court below's punishment (fine 1,800,000) is appropriate and too unreasonable.

2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However) Of the judgment below's 10th of "criminal facts", "a public official in charge of family register has submitted it, and accordingly, a public official in charge of the above family register who knows the fact has submitted it to the public official in charge of nationality affairs, and accordingly, the public official in charge of the above public official in charge of family register who knows the fact is clearly a clerical error in "a public official in charge of family register who does not know the fact again by having the public official in charge of family register notify the fact to the public official in charge of family register so it is clear that it