The defendant shall be innocent.

On February 28, 2011, the summary of the facts charged, the Defendant, with the knowledge that he/she would be able to obtain money after extension of the period of stay in Mongolia, and did not intend to marry with B. The Defendant, with the knowledge that he/she would be able to obtain money after extension of the period of stay. On February 28, 201, the public service center of the public service center of the public service center of the public office of the public office of the public office of the public office of the public office of the public office of the public office of the public office of the public office of the public office of the public office of the public office of the public office of the public office of the public office of the public office of the public office of the public office of the public office of Mongolia who was aware of the fact that he/she is a party to marriage

Furthermore, the above date, at the same place, reported false facts, and the public official in charge of family register in the name-free statement was allowed to enter false facts in the family relation registration information system, which is a public electronic record, and used them by having the public official in charge of family register enter false facts in the family relation registration information system, which is an un

Facts of recognition

around April 2010, the Defendant met B with C’s introduction, which is operating a marriage specialized broker in Mongolia, in the sixth degree of punishment of Mongolia, and entered Korea on March 16, 2012 after the marriage report with B on February 28, 2011.

From around that time, the Defendant had lived with B on May 22, 2012 at his/her residence. On May 31, 2012, the Defendant stated to the effect that “On May 22, 2012, he/she got knee, etc. in a computer, etc.” to the investigative agency on May 22, 2012.

On March 4, 2014, the Defendant filed a divorce suit against B on the ground of assault and confinement in B, and claimed consolation money.

Judgment

The evidence supporting the facts charged in this case lies in the statements made by the investigation agency B, the translation of the contents of the Defendant’s Mesenger conversation, and the telephone conversation with Mongolian interpreter D.