logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1963. 7. 25. 선고 63다289 판결
[가옥명도][집11(2)민,071]
Main Issues

Matters to be examined under the premise for recognizing the fact that the sales contract agreed to perform simultaneously with the obligation to pay the balance of the purchase price for the registration of ownership transfer is legally rescinded.

Summary of Judgment

In order to recognize the fact that the sales contract agreed to perform simultaneously with the obligation to pay the balance of the purchase price for the registration of ownership transfer is legally rescinded, it is necessary to examine whether the performance of the registration is offered and whether the period of the performance is the highest and reasonable termination of the contract

[Reference Provisions]

Articles 536, 543, 544, and 568 of the Civil Act; Articles 126, and 394 of the Civil Procedure Act

Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant), Appellee

Machan (Seoul)

Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff)-Appellant

Man Jae-be et al.

Judgment of the lower court

Gwangju District Court Decision 62Na291 delivered on April 17, 1963

Text

We reverse the original judgment.

The case is remanded to the Gwangju High Court.

Reasons

Examining the original judgment, the lower court determined that the Defendants’ testimony at the 1, 2-1, 3-2-1, 4-2-1, and 3-2-2 of the evidence Nos. 1, 2-1, 3-1, and 4-2 of the Plaintiff’s evidence No. 3-1, 2-1, and 4-2 of the Plaintiff’s testimony at the lower court, which was admitted as evidence of the above facts, were to purchase KRW 35,00 on April 14, 1960 and paid KRW 40,00 on the day to pay the remainder to August 15 of the same year as the down payment, and the above Defendant did not pay the remainder by the agreed deadline, and thus, the lower court determined that the Defendants’ above contract was not lawfully discharged on the grounds that the lower court did not have any legitimate obligation to cancel the registration of the Plaintiff’s remainder payment obligations and the Plaintiff’s transfer of ownership, and thus, it did not err in its conclusion by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations on the grounds of the lower judgment.

Therefore, the decision of the court below is delivered with the assent of all Justices who participated in the trial in order to hold a new trial.

The judges of the Supreme Court, both judges (Presiding Judge) and Magyeong, Mag-Jak, the highest leapble leapbal of Red Mags

arrow
심급 사건
-광주고등법원 1963.4.17.선고 62나291
기타문서