logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.01.16 2017고단2696
임대주택법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

[criminal records] On June 21, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year at the Seoul Central District Court on the grounds of fraud, etc., and the said judgment became final and conclusive on June 29, 2017.

[2] The lessee of a public rental apartment can not transfer or sublease the right of lease to another person, unless all the members of the household of the lessee of the rental house move into the rental house and the reasons such as work, occupation, treatment of disease, etc. occur, and no one shall arrange such transfer or sublet.

The Defendant, from April 2014 to the present date, is a person who acquired a business building for the D apartment in Young-gu, Suwon-si, and actually operated “F real estate” with E, etc.

The Defendant was in charge of the approval of the transfer of the right of lease at LH Corporation I through G and H, a real estate business entity, at the request of both parties who have acquired the right of lease without the approval of LH construction, upon request for the transfer of the right of lease from the transferor or those who have acquired the right

The J acquired the schedule of workplace inspection of the transferor in advance, and notified the transferor to the transferor, thereby allowing him to pass the workplace inspection, etc., in order to arrange for the transfer of the right of lease by the lessee who is not a reason for the transfer of the right of lease.

On May 2015, the Defendant: (a) provided the transferor K with false business address and false domicile and notified the schedule of the actual inspection of the place of business through H upon request of the transferor K for the transfer of the right of lease despite the absence of the grounds for the transfer of the right of lease; (b) provided the transferor K with relevant documents; and (c) arranged the transfer of the right of lease under the same method four times in total, including arranging the transfer of the right of lease in the absence of justifiable grounds for the transfer of the right of lease; and (d) arranged the transfer of the right of lease under the same manner as indicated in the list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect by the prosecution against K;

arrow